face the charge of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the Directorate General of Cultural Heritage citing a "gross mismanagement" by José Naveiras Escanlar in front of the Museum Salime Grandas. True
not prevent José Naveiras withdraw museum objects, it is also true that we discuss what objects they own, who better than yourself to know what is yours? Pepe asked his notebooks handwritten, their agendas, that Mr. Cuesta Toribio has told the museum owned. Has been prevented from collecting his office the day of termination and now, 22 days later, he asks what is yours. Pepe's books, bought before the foundation of the museum, notebooks, articles and reflections, diaries, journals are owned, are not owned by the museum, is his life. We urge anyone to get in the situation of Pepe: 1 create a project that no one trusted, 2 do it actually, 3 º impel the administration to get involved in the project groups, 4 º manage underfunded for 20 years , 5 th will kick you off cut budgets and management of the consortium, 6 th stop you in your work, 7 stop you from taking your belongings and you discredit, 8 question is what are your personal items and you still discrediting. Really amazing. It seems that this compels the most vile and exploitative business, but not the public with our leaders in front.
documentation is considered more serious than I thought, culture, as stated. He spent a monthly statement of accounts is an account of which neither Peter nor any employees are attorneys. If someone you review the financial statements delivered by the museum would see the day to day for errors inevitable in all daily accounting. An audit will clarify whether or not errors serious enough to dismiss José Naveiras, we would ask that the same audit attributed the errors to whom it may concern, lest José Naveiras have to also bear the mistakes of the Ministry. From the museum sent bank statements every month who supervised them? If there were errors, why not warned? Why was not training for museum staff DOMUS program? Are we going to audit the accounts in all public museums Asturias?, What screening test exceeded Mr. Cuesta Toribio to be the director?
Pepe and all museum employees, performing their duties, their contracts have been approved at the time by the Ministry, to manage museum needed more staff available to serve the 20,000 visit per year is needed to have more guides to cleaning the museum takes more than a half-time employee. The balance of the museum management has been achieved thanks to Pepe way of being and cooperation of employees, thanks to people from large and many friends.
many personal and family explanations will have to give Pepe to clarify the unfounded allegations of Ministry of Culture, to try to justify his dismissal. Civil society is clear that this is a political maneuver to distract Pepe Grandas Museum because it prevented the handling of the Historical Park on the Museum Navia. These facts to all appearances, were agreed politically that the company now looking reasons protest unfounded and discredited the work of Pepe to try to justify the abuse of our leaders on cultural heritage.
February 18, 2010
Communication Area Support Platform Pepe Ferreiro
http://apoyoapepe.blogspot.com
apoyoapepe@gmail.com
